Tom, > Looks like we had a misunderstanding. Did the authors think of the configured > subnetwork identifier of the existing text as being configured for a > particular rule, in effect another rule parameter? I took it to be configured > as a single value used in conjunction with all FMRs to calculate the target > MAP IPv6 addresses.
apologies, I think I confused myself as well. if we were to support a configurable subnet-id, it would have to be a per BMR/FMR property. the base document really just leaves the 'hook' for a provisioning mechanism to use. cheers, Ole _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
