On Nov 1, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Ole Troan <[email protected]> wrote: > if we follow the principle of DHCPv6 is used to provision the link-layer (aka > tunnel), > DHCPv4 is used to configure the IPv4 protocol. then I wonder if we shouldn't > really > _only_ use DHCPv4 for LW46 IPv4 configuration. does that make sense?
DHCPv6 would still deliver the AFTR address, right? I don't personally see a lot of value in having two ways of delivering the IPv4 address for lw4over6, but maybe the authors can explain? _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
