On 01 Nov 2013, at 14:50 , Ted Lemon <[email protected]> wrote: > On Nov 1, 2013, at 9:48 AM, Ole Troan <[email protected]> wrote: >> if we follow the principle of DHCPv6 is used to provision the link-layer >> (aka tunnel), >> DHCPv4 is used to configure the IPv4 protocol. then I wonder if we shouldn't >> really >> _only_ use DHCPv4 for LW46 IPv4 configuration. does that make sense? > > DHCPv6 would still deliver the AFTR address, right? I don't personally see > a lot of value in having two ways of delivering the IPv4 address for > lw4over6, but maybe the authors can explain?
absolutely, the AFTR address is part of link-layer provisioning, so that would be done with DHCPv6. but 'nothing' else. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
