> >> if we follow the principle of DHCPv6 is used to provision the link-layer > >> (aka tunnel), > >> DHCPv4 is used to configure the IPv4 protocol. then I wonder if we > >> shouldn't really > >> _only_ use DHCPv4 for LW46 IPv4 configuration. does that make sense? > > > > DHCPv6 would still deliver the AFTR address, right? I don't personally > > see a lot of value in having two ways of delivering the IPv4 address for > > lw4over6, but maybe the authors can explain? > > absolutely, the AFTR address is part of link-layer provisioning, so that > would be done with DHCPv6. but 'nothing' else. > > Besides DHCPv4-based method, PCP is also proposed for lw4o6 IPv4 > configuration. According to > http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-perreault-softwire-lw4over6-pcp-00, the > provisioning process is the same: > (1) Provision AFTR address by DHCPv6 option; > (2) Provision (IPv4 address + ports) by PCP > > Do you mean DHCPv6 in step(1) should be avoided ?
no. Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
