On Mar 4, 2014, at 9:54 AM, Ian Farrer <[email protected]> wrote: > Should there be a draft which discusses the available softwire solutions more > throughly (we would tackle this only after we’ve got the WGCLs completed, so > there’s something to actually compare)? > > A basket of vipers, I’m sure, but it wold give somewhere for a much more > complete analysis of the pros and cons rather than a line and a half of > analysis in the technology specific drafts.
The good thing about this is that there is no time pressure; even if there may be some future need for this document, there is no current need for the current round of implementors, whereas getting the base specs out is pretty important. Of course, the bad thing about this is that there is no time pressure, and I would hate to see softwire spend the next two or four years arguing about this document. But with those caveats in mind, this sounds like a good idea. _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
