Dear all, Sorry I don't agree the following changes Woj proposed, same reason as Ted mentioned below.
Thank you, Tina On Mar 3, 2014, at 5:55 AM, "Ted Lemon" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: On Mar 3, 2014, at 1:47 PM, Wojciech Dec <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: Lightweight 4over6 provides a solution for a hub-and-spoke softwire architecture only, where the AFTR maintains (softwire) state for each subscriber. A means for optmizing the amount of such state, as well as the option of meshed IPv4 connectivity between subscribers, are features of the [ I-D.ietf-softwire-map] solution. This sounds like a marketing change, not an ICMP change. Can you explain what this has to do with ICMP? _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
