>> This could certainly save a spending the rest of the week micro-editing >> wording, so I’d be happy with it. >> >> An extremely tentative further suggestion: >> >> Should there be a draft which discusses the available softwire solutions >> more throughly (we would tackle this only after we’ve got the WGCLs >> completed, so there’s something to actually compare)? >> >> A basket of vipers, I’m sure, but it wold give somewhere for a much more >> complete analysis of the pros and cons rather than a line and a half of >> analysis in the technology specific drafts. > > I think could be an useful effort but I do think that writing an objective > document is going to be extremely hard. I think we will have problems even > agreeing on the axes of comparison, let alone the evaluation of the solutions > along these axes.
I agree with Suresh. the outcome of the working group is to publish 5 largely equal mechanisms. then it is up to the market to decide which mechanism will be successful. I don't really see what more the IETF can do to contribute to that process. cheers, Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
