No. As long as you know what particular mechanism you B4 vendor has implemented, you can provision accordingly.
The lwAFTR never has to do the LPM. It’s just got a tunnel endpoint address configured by the operator. Cheers, Ian On 5 Mar 2014, at 14:34, Simon Perreault <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 2014-03-05 14:29, Ian Farrer a écrit : >> If the longest prefix match returns more than one matching prefix, then an >> implementation specific tie-breaker MUST be performed to return a single >> prefix. > > Does this mean that the lwB4 and lwAFTR would need to be from the same > vendor? > > Simon > -- > DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca > NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca > STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
