Fine then. Simon
Le 2014-03-05 14:38, Ian Farrer a écrit : > No. As long as you know what particular mechanism you B4 vendor has > implemented, you can provision accordingly. > > The lwAFTR never has to do the LPM. It’s just got a tunnel endpoint address > configured by the operator. > > Cheers, > Ian > > > On 5 Mar 2014, at 14:34, Simon Perreault <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Le 2014-03-05 14:29, Ian Farrer a écrit : >>> If the longest prefix match returns more than one matching prefix, then an >>> implementation specific tie-breaker MUST be performed to return a single >>> prefix. >> >> Does this mean that the lwB4 and lwAFTR would need to be from the same >> vendor? >> >> Simon >> -- >> DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca >> NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca >> STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca > -- DTN made easy, lean, and smart --> http://postellation.viagenie.ca NAT64/DNS64 open-source --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca STUN/TURN server --> http://numb.viagenie.ca _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
