Yuchi, > IMHO doing LPM with the lwAFTR's address is more straightforward than with a > "Domain v6 prefix". > > In addition, I don't see why Ian's proposal cannot cover the case you > mentioned, the case in which an address out of the prefix domain can be > chosen as the tunnel endpoint address. If lwB4 has been provisioned with such > an address, and if this address does have a LPM with lwAFTR's address, lwB4 > can still use it as the tunnel endpoint address. Please correct me if I'm > missing anything.
there are two issues here.
1) in the unified CPE context. is there a benefit in having the same algorithm
to choose the CE tunnel endpoint address?
are the requirements different?
2) pick the right mechanism for tunnel end point determination. in your above
scheme you do not have the same flexibility as you have with a provisioned
prefix selector
I though we had covered one in previous discussions, but there might be
something I've missed.
are we in agreement on this point? that it is beneficial to use the same
mechanism for tunnel endpoint address determination on the CE.
cheers,
Ole
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
