This draft did pass the last WGLC. The later modification came from MIB doctor review and the modification of depending document NAT-MIB. This second last WGLC is necessary giving these new modifications. I support the modifications and moving the document forward.
Best regards, Sheng >-----Original Message----- >From: Softwires [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yong Cui >Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 8:05 PM >To: [email protected] >Cc: Cui 崔勇 >Subject: [Softwires] WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07 > >Hi folks, > >This message starts a two week softwire working group last call on >advancing the draft of DS-Lite MIB as a Standards Track RFC. > >After we had the first wglc on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-02, >there were some major comments. The authors have revised the >document including the structure and detailed technical contents. >Now the authors believe that this version has addressed all the >issues. > >The latest version of the draft is available at: >http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07.txt > >Substantive comments and statements of support/opposition for >advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. >Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This >last call will conclude on February 3, 2015. > > >Thanks, > >Yong & Suresh > >_______________________________________________ >Softwires mailing list >[email protected] >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
