Actually, you're a little behind on the NATV2-MIB document. draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib-11 has been replaced by the two documents draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-00.txt and draft-perrault-behave-natv2-mib-00.txt
I submitted the latter a couple of days ago. The deprecate draft will see a minor update shortly, and there is a bit more work to be done on the natv2 draft. We would love to have comments on that one.
In any event, I see an action on myself to look over the Softwire MIB documents.
Tom Taylor On 22/01/2015 1:57 AM, Tina TSOU wrote:
Dear Sheng et al, Below are the NAT MIB drafts status. draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib-11<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-behave-nat-mib/> Definitions of Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT) 2014-01-24 Expert Review::Revised I-D Needed (for 175 days) WG Document Spencer Dawkins draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1-00<http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-perrault-behave-deprecate-nat-mib-v1/> Deprecation of MIB Module NAT-MIB (Managed Objects for Network Address Translators (NAT)) 2014-10-19 AD Evaluation::Revised I-D Needed (for 5 days) IETF Spencer Dawkins Thank you, Tina On Jan 22, 2015, at 2:30 PM, Sheng Jiang <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: This draft did pass the last WGLC. The later modification came from MIB doctor review and the modification of depending document NAT-MIB. This second last WGLC is necessary giving these new modifications. I support the modifications and moving the document forward. Best regards, Sheng -----Original Message----- From: Softwires [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Yong Cui Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2015 8:05 PM To: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> Cc: Cui 崔勇 Subject: [Softwires] WGLC for draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07 Hi folks, This message starts a two week softwire working group last call on advancing the draft of DS-Lite MIB as a Standards Track RFC. After we had the first wglc on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-02, there were some major comments. The authors have revised the document including the structure and detailed technical contents. Now the authors believe that this version has addressed all the issues. The latest version of the draft is available at: http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-mib-07.txt Substantive comments and statements of support/opposition for advancing this document should be directed to the mailing list. Editorial suggestions can be sent directly to the authors. This last call will conclude on February 3, 2015. Thanks, Yong & Suresh _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
