On Oct 14, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Behcet Sarikaya <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 2:34 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >> As Mesh topology multicast, DS-lite multicast as well as multicast prefix >> option documents are all going to be proposed as Standard, I think the >> companion document >> http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext-08.txt in >> the potential items for rechartering Part 2 is also worthy to be included in >> the rechartering process to form a set of solutions to solve multicast in >> transiton scenarioes. >> >> Also as a coauthor of draft-hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext-08, I think >> this draft is mature to advance further :) >> > > Me too, as a co-author, I would like to see MAP (and lw4over6) > multicast to be taken up as charter item and yes this draft is also > mature to advance.
Is there any market pressure behind the push to complete the multicast story for DS-lite, MAP and lw40ver6, or would we just be doing this for completeness? _______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
