Dear all, I think multicast-radius is an useful solution for IPv6 transition multicast technology and we also have plan of some deployment about it.
IMO, multicast-radius should be in new milestone in PART 1 rather than PART2. Because multicast-radius is a companion document of multicast-dhcp(draft-ietf-softwire-multicast-prefix-option-09), just like "map-radius(draft-ietf-softwire-map-radius-04) and map-dhcp(RFC 7598)". Multicast-radius is not a new type of multicast technology. In fact, it tries to assist multicast-dhcp document to support all kinds of multicast transition technology, including Mesh multicast and DS-Lite multicast. Thanks Chongfeng Xie [email protected] 发件人： wang.cui1 发送时间： 2015-10-14 15:34 收件人： Suresh Krishnan 抄送： Softwires WG; Softwires; Yong Cui 主题： Re: [Softwires] Milestone update and closing/rechartering discussion Dear Chairs, As Mesh topology multicast, DS-lite multicast as well as multicast prefix option documents are all going to be proposed as Standard, I think the companion document http://tools.ietf.org/id/draft-hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext-08.txt in the potential items for rechartering Part 2 is also worthy to be included in the rechartering process to form a set of solutions to solve multicast in transiton scenarioes. Also as a coauthor of draft-hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext-08, I think this draft is mature to advance further :) Thanks very much :) Best Regards, Linda Wang "Softwires" <[email protected]> 写于 2015/10/14 07:13:30: > Suresh Krishnan <[email protected]> > 发件人: "Softwires" <[email protected]> > > 2015/10/14 07:13 > > 收件人 > > Softwires WG <[email protected]>, > > 抄送 > > Yong Cui <[email protected]> > > 主题 > > [Softwires] Milestone update and closing/rechartering discussion > > Hi all, > As we mentioned in the last meeting we are trying to wind down the > softwire working group in an orderly fashion and trying to make sure > that no essential documents are left out. > > Milestones update > ================= > > To start off we would like to update the milestones for the open > deliverables. If you think that the timelines are off or if you think > any of these deliverables are not needed, please feel to speak up. > > Nov 2015 Submit MAP RADIUS attribute document for Proposed Standard > (decide whether to include lw4o6 or not) > > Nov 2015 Submit MAP MIB module document for Proposed Standard > > Nov 2015 Adopt MAP-T deployment scenarios as a WG document > (Already adopted as wg item earlier. Reconfirm) > > Dec 2015 Submit Mesh topology multicast document as Proposed Standard > > Dec 2015 Submit DS-lite multicast document for Proposed Standard > > Jan 2016 Submit multicast prefix option document as Proposed Standard > > Jan 2016 Submit MAP deployment document as Informational > > Mar 2016 Submit softwire YANG model document for Proposed Standard > > Mar 2016 Submit Unified Softwire CPE document for Proposed Standard > > Mar 2016 Submit MAP-T deployment scenarios for Informational > > Apr 2016 Conclude WG > > > Potential items for new milestones: Part 1 > ========================================== > > There are also some drafts (or draft ideas) that have seen some support > at the meetings when they were presented or discussed. We would like to > gauge the support for these drafts before we add them to the milestones. > > Softwire YANG model draft > draft-sun-softwire-yang-04 > > Dynamic IPv4 Provisioning for Lightweight 4over6 > draft-liu-softwire-lw4over6-dynamic-provisioning-00 > > Lightweight 4over6 operational document > (Idea floated - no current draft) > > > Potential items for rechartering: Part 2 > ======================================== > > There are also a few other drafts that have been presented and the > authors have requested that they be included in the rechartering process > (if there is one). Similar to the items in Part 1, we would like to > gauge the support for these drafts as well before we decide to work on them. > > RADIUS Extensions for IPv4-Embedded Multicast and Unicast IPv6 Prefixes > draft-hu-softwire-multicast-radius-ext-08 > > Multicast Support for Mapping of Address and Port Protocol and Light > Weight 4over6 > draft-sarikaya-softwire-map-multicast-04 > > There are also a few other drafts floating around that could be of > potential interest to softwires. If you feel that there are other drafts > that need to be considered, feel free to propose them here as well. If > we see a very strong need for a recharter we will work with the ADs to > decide on the further steps. > > Thanks > Suresh > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
