I support to move forward.
From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM To: Ian Farrer <[email protected]>, softwires <[email protected]> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> Subject: RE: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16 Resent-From: <[email protected]> Resent-To: <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> Resent-Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM Re-, As mentioned in another message, I don’t see how this IPR applies to the draft given that the patent itself cites the softwire draft in the prior art! I support the draft to advance in the publication process. Cheers, Med De : Softwires [mailto:[email protected]] De la part de Ian Farrer Envoyé : mardi 4 octobre 2016 09:39 À : softwires Cc : [email protected] Objet : [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16 Hi, A few weeks back, we sent out an question asking the WG their opinion on how to proceed with draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast in light of the IPR disclosure. No responses to this question were received. According to RFC3669, in order for a draft with an IPR disclosure to advance there needs to be consensus of the WG. No response is not consensus to proceed. In light of this, we ask the WG again for their opinions on how to proceed. If insufficient support is shown, then work on the draft will cease. Please respond by 18th October. thanks, Yong & Ian Details of the IPR Disclosure are at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2873/ United States Patent # 9,014,189 Date Granted: April 21, 2015
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
