Dear all, Agree with Christian, I also think the text of the patent is citing the draft as prior art, therefore this patent can not apply to draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast.
So I support this draft move to next step. On Thursday, October 6, 2016, Jacni Q <[email protected]> wrote: > Re-, > > Not aware of any IPR applied to the draft from my side, and I support to > move forward, thanks > > -Q > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 10:37 PM, Lee, Yiu <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> wrote: > >> I support to move forward. >> >> >> >> *From: *"[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>" < >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> *Date: *Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM >> *To: *Ian Farrer <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>, softwires < >> [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> *Cc: *"[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>" >> <[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> > >> *Subject: *RE: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on >> draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16 >> *Resent-From: *<[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> *Resent-To: *<[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>, < >> [email protected] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>, < >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>, < >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>>, < >> [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> >> *Resent-Date: *Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM >> >> >> >> Re-, >> >> >> >> As mentioned in another message, I don’t see how this IPR applies to the >> draft given that the patent itself cites the softwire draft in the prior >> art! >> >> >> >> I support the draft to advance in the publication process. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Med >> >> >> >> *De :* Softwires [mailto:[email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>] *De la >> part de* Ian Farrer >> *Envoyé :* mardi 4 octobre 2016 09:39 >> *À :* softwires >> *Cc :* [email protected] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');> >> *Objet :* [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on >> draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16 >> >> >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> A few weeks back, we sent out an question asking the WG their opinion on >> how to proceed with draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast in light of the >> IPR disclosure. No responses to this question were received. >> >> >> >> According to RFC3669, in order for a draft with an IPR disclosure to >> advance there needs to be consensus of the WG. No response is not consensus >> to proceed. >> >> >> >> In light of this, we ask the WG again for their opinions on how to >> proceed. If insufficient support is shown, then work on the draft will >> cease. >> >> >> >> Please respond by 18th October. >> >> >> >> thanks, >> >> Yong & Ian >> >> >> >> Details of the IPR Disclosure are at: >> >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2873/ >> >> >> >> United States Patent # 9,014,189 >> >> Date Granted: April 21, 2015 >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > Cheers, > -Q >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
