Hi Yiu, Can you provide some information about the reasoning behind your support?
I have spent some time today reading the case studies in section 4 of RFC3669, and it would be useful to know if you think that any of these are applicable here and why. Thanks, Ian > On 04 Oct 2016, at 16:37, Lee, Yiu <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: > > I support to move forward. > > From: "[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM > To: Ian Farrer <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>, softwires > <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Cc: "[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>" > <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Subject: RE: [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16 > Resent-From: <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> > Resent-To: <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>>, <[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>> > Resent-Date: Tuesday, October 4, 2016 at 3:45 AM > > Re-, > > As mentioned in another message, I don’t see how this IPR applies to the > draft given that the patent itself cites the softwire draft in the prior art! > > I support the draft to advance in the publication process. > > Cheers, > Med > > De : Softwires [mailto:[email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>] De la part de Ian Farrer > Envoyé : mardi 4 octobre 2016 09:39 > À : softwires > Cc : [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]> > Objet : [Softwires] PLEASE READ - IPR Disclosure question on > draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast - Respond by 18/10/16 > > Hi, > > A few weeks back, we sent out an question asking the WG their opinion on how > to proceed with draft-ietf-softwire-dslite-multicast in light of the IPR > disclosure. No responses to this question were received. > > According to RFC3669, in order for a draft with an IPR disclosure to advance > there needs to be consensus of the WG. No response is not consensus to > proceed. > > In light of this, we ask the WG again for their opinions on how to proceed. > If insufficient support is shown, then work on the draft will cease. > > Please respond by 18th October. > > thanks, > Yong & Ian > > Details of the IPR Disclosure are at: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2873/ > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2873/> > > United States Patent # 9,014,189 > Date Granted: April 21, 2015 > > > > > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
