Dear all, I support moving forward with this draft. This is a missing part for deploying softwire 4over6 transition mechanisms. The YANG model itself has been developed for a reasonable period of time and is now mature enough for being a standard.
// disclosure: I'm one of the co-authors. Thanks, Qi On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Sheng Jiang <[email protected]> wrote: > This email announces a Softwire Working Group Last Call (WGLC) on: > > > > Since both chairs of softwire WG are the co-authors of this document. I am > now acting as the document shepherd for this draft. > > > > YANG Modules for IPv4-in-IPv6 Address plus Port > Softwires > > draft-ietf-softwire-yang-04 > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-softwire-yang-04 > > > > This draft is intended to become a Standard Track RFC. > > > > This WGLC will run through the end of the day on Wednesday, June 27, 2018. > > > > Comments should be sent to the [email protected] list, although purely > > editorial comments may be sent directly to the author. > > > > No IPR disclosures have been submitted directly on > > draft-ietf-softwire-yang-04 > > > > Regards and thanks, > > > > Sheng Jiang (document shepherd) > > _______________________________________________ > Softwires mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires > >
_______________________________________________ Softwires mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/softwires
