--- El vie, 8/19/11, Juan Carlos Gentile <[email protected]> escribió:
> De: Juan Carlos Gentile <[email protected]> > Asunto: Re: [Solar-general] "no ideologicemos el concepto de software público > " > A: "La lista de todos y todas en solar" <[email protected]> > Fecha: viernes, 19 de agosto de 2011, 04:00 pm > On Thursday 18 August 2011, Diego > Saravia wrote: > > > aun desde una filosofia talibana del SL, > > > > eso es un insulto. que tienen que ver los talibanes > con el soft libre? > > > > > yo creo que HAY que ideologizar el tema, > > > > El tema es ideologico, lamentablemente, en el sentido > marxista y > > peyorativo de la ideologia > > > > es decir ideologia es lo que no es ciencia > > > > > > lo que hay que hacer es politizar el tema > > > > > lo que quedo claro en estas jornadas que hay un > fuerte criterio, > > > que seguramente pasara a ser el mas sustentable, > > > que la licencia basica debe ser la GPL v 2.0, > > > > por que no 3.0? > > > > > mira esto: > > droid GPLv2 termination worries: one more reason to upgrade > to GPLv3 > From: "Free Software Foundation" <[email protected]> > To: Hipatia <[email protected]> > > Distributors lose their rights when they violate > GPLv2, but the Free > Software Foundation is more forgiving in its license > enforcement to > encourage continued participation in the free > software community. > GPLv3 has improved termination provisions to codify > this approach, > giving developers one more reason to upgrade. > > Thanks to Android's commercial success, the kernel Linux, > which is > released under the GNU General Public License (GPL) version > 2, is > being distributed more than ever before. Whenever > someone distributes > GPL-covered software, they must follow a few conditions set > forth in > the license. These conditions try to give anyone who > receives the > software both the legal permission and the practical tools > necessary > to change and share the software themselves if they wish. > > Not all of the companies that distribute Android heed > these > conditions. We've witnessed an uptick in GPL > violation > reports--some convincing, others incomplete or > misinformed--against these vendors. We generally > can't pursue > these violations directly, because only copyright holders > can enforce > free software licenses in most countries, and few Android > devices use > FSF-copyrighted code. However, people still seek out > our opinions > about the relevant parts of the GPL, and that discussion > has recently > turned to GPLv2's termination provisions. Section 4 > of the license > says, "You may not copy, modify, sublicense, or distribute > the > Program except as expressly provided under this License. > Any attempt > otherwise to copy, modify, sublicense or distribute the > Program is > void, and will automatically terminate your rights under > this > License." es cierto lo que aclaras ! uno de los criterios para referir la v2 es que de esta se puede pasar a una v3, pero no a la inversa, pero no es algo que no es un dogma, por el contrario, estimo que aportes como los que has hecho ayudaran a tener mejores opciones... ________________________________________________ Solar-General es una lista abierta a toda la comunidad, sin ninguna moderación, por lo que se apela a la tolerancia y al respeto mutuo. Las opiniones expresadas son responsabilidad exclusiva de sus respectivos/as autores/as. La Asociación Solar no se hace responsable por los mensajes vertidos, ni representan necesariamente el punto de vista de la Asociación Solar. [email protected] https://lists.ourproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/solar-general
