[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-73?page=comments#action_12454182 ] Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-73: ----------------------------------
> Full class names are less ambiguous. But what's the context that one needs to resolve the ambiguity? I'm not looking at the schema as a wire-up-the-java-classes type of IOC thing, but more like the configuration file for a *user* that needs to specify how they want things indexed. > If we want usability for non-programmers, we can't have them editing an XML > file. Well designed XML can be editable by hand IMO. That's all that we have until someone comes up with a schema-creation GUI. Given the bugs and round-trip problems that XML creating GUIs always seem to have, I still prefer to go straight to the source. > schema.xml and solrconfig.xml use CNET-internal class names > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > Key: SOLR-73 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-73 > Project: Solr > Issue Type: Bug > Components: search > Reporter: Walter Underwood > > The configuration files in the example directory still use the old > CNET-internal class names, like solr.LRUCache instead of > org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache. This is confusing to new users and should > be fixed before the first release. -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
