[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12558525#action_12558525
]
Hoss Man commented on SOLR-356:
-------------------------------
I'm not really following this issue, but in skimming the comments i just wanted
to toss out the idea that the approach taken by the Lucene-java
xml-query-parser contrib might make sense here.
it's got the same basic problem: support parsing and building of nested
(query/function) structures where user configuration tells you which
(query/function) name maps to which implementation.
the code may not be reusable in this case, but the pattern may be (not that i
remember much about what the pattern was, just that it made a lot of sense when
it was being fleshed out)
> pluggable functions (value sources)
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-356
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-356
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Attachments: pluggableFunctions.patch, pluggableFunctions.patch
>
>
> allow configuration of new value sources ot be created by the function query
> parser.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
