[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559075#action_12559075
]
Doug Daniels commented on SOLR-356:
-----------------------------------
I found that thread at [http://marc.info/?l=lucene-dev&m=113355526731460&w=2].
It's quite a lengthy thread, but from what I read I agree that it's trying to
solve a similar problem (plus a few additional problems that solr has since
solved nicely).
Perhaps it's just personal preference, but I find XML description of functions,
though powerful and expressive, quite a bit clunky. I far prefer the
functional style for this sort of task.
Maybe I'm missing something from the recommendation though. Were you
recommending using XML to express the functions themselves, or something else
about the xml-query-parser?
> pluggable functions (value sources)
> -----------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-356
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-356
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Yonik Seeley
> Attachments: pluggableFunctions.patch, pluggableFunctions.patch
>
>
> allow configuration of new value sources ot be created by the function query
> parser.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
