[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762177#action_12762177
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1483:
---------------------------------------------
Noting Grant's comments from the mailing list:
{quote}
It seems like we should have tint4, tint8 instead of just 8, no? My impression
of the Lucene javadocs is that a step of 4 for ints/floats was more appropriate.
{quote}
Also, StatsComponent does work with int/float/long/double/tdate types against
the comment on the fields in schema. It does not work with the
tint/tfloat/tlong/tdouble/tdate fields.
> Example schema is confusing with int, tint and pint fields
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1483
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1483
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Fix For: 1.4
>
>
> Example schema defines int (TrieIntField), tint (TrieIntField) and pint
> (IntField) which is confusing. In particular, the comments for int fields
> tell users to use tint types (which is the same thing).
> Let us remove tint, tlong, tdouble, tdate types from example schemas and fix
> the comments - carefully noting the things trie fields do not work with.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
