[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762238#action_12762238
]
Shalin Shekhar Mangar commented on SOLR-1483:
---------------------------------------------
bq. On changing the precisionSteps... it feels like working in the dark a
bit... I still haven't seen any good analysis on the size penalty that goes
along with the performance increase.
I agree. Anyways, it is not related to this issue.
Should I commit this patch? Anything that needs to be added or clarified?
> Example schema is confusing with int, tint and pint fields
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1483
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1483
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-1483.patch
>
>
> Example schema defines int (TrieIntField), tint (TrieIntField) and pint
> (IntField) which is confusing. In particular, the comments for int fields
> tell users to use tint types (which is the same thing).
> Let us remove tint, tlong, tdouble, tdate types from example schemas and fix
> the comments - carefully noting the things trie fields do not work with.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
