[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12762242#action_12762242
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-1483:
------------------------------------
I think the patch is way to verbose...
Solr is growing up - we shouldn't have a numeric field and say "hey, it
supports sorting as a feature!" Wouldn't one expect you could do sorting,
range queries, faceting, function queries, etc? We should really only need to
call out what doesn't work.
I also don't see why we want to call out that Trie fields are new in the schema
- seems like more noise.
I'll try and revisit / review your other points (#4 and #5) soon.
> Example schema is confusing with int, tint and pint fields
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: SOLR-1483
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-1483
> Project: Solr
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: documentation
> Reporter: Shalin Shekhar Mangar
> Fix For: 1.4
>
> Attachments: SOLR-1483.patch
>
>
> Example schema defines int (TrieIntField), tint (TrieIntField) and pint
> (IntField) which is confusing. In particular, the comments for int fields
> tell users to use tint types (which is the same thing).
> Let us remove tint, tlong, tdouble, tdate types from example schemas and fix
> the comments - carefully noting the things trie fields do not work with.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
