another minor addition:
 - move to Junti4 for new tests... and some old tests might be
migrated (for speed issues)

I already have a SolrTestCaseJ4 that extends LuceneTestCase4J that
avoids spinning up a solr core for each test method... but I need to
be able to reference  LuceneTestCase4J from the lucene sources (i.e it
works in the IDE, but not on the command line right now).

-Yonik




On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 10:00 AM, Yonik Seeley <yo...@apache.org> wrote:
> Here is a very rough list of what makes sense to me:
> - since lucene is on a new major version, the next solr release
> containing that sould have a new major version number
>  - this does not preclude further releases on 1.x
>  - for simplicity, and the "single dev" model, we should just sync
> with lucene's... i.e. the next major Solr version would be 3.1
> - branches/solr would become the new trunk, with a shared trunk with
> lucene in some structure (see other thread)
> - solr cloud branch gets merged in
> - we move to Java6 (Java5 has already been EOLd by Sun unless you pay
> money... and we need Java6 for zookeeper, scripting)
> - remove deprecations (finally!), and perhaps some additional cleanups
> that we've wanted to do
>
> -Yonik
>

Reply via email to