On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 2:25 PM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> wrote: > > : We try not to do that then. Things make a lot more sense when one > : starts thinking of them as a single project, w/o multiple downloads. > : > : If major modules were to be pulled from Solr and put into Lucene, and > : Solr wanted to make some big changes for a major version number bump? > : How could it do so w/o lucene doing that? It's the same issue. > > No, actaully it's the converse issue -- if a major piece moves from "solr" > to "core" and a *person* wanted to make a major change to that piece of > functionality that wasn't backwards compatible, then "core" would > certianly need to undergo a major version bump.
To try and put it simply - w/o an attempt at synchronized releases, I'm against of code/modules moving out of solr. It get's to the heart of why we merged in the first place. -Yonik
