On Mar 16, 2010, at 11:00 AM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > Here is a very rough list of what makes sense to me: > - since lucene is on a new major version, the next solr release > containing that sould have a new major version number > - this does not preclude further releases on 1.x > - for simplicity, and the "single dev" model, we should just sync > with lucene's... i.e. the next major Solr version would be 3.1 > - branches/solr would become the new trunk, with a shared trunk with > lucene in some structure (see other thread) > - solr cloud branch gets merged in > - we move to Java6 (Java5 has already been EOLd by Sun unless you pay > money... and we need Java6 for zookeeper, scripting)
Hmm, how does that effect Lucene, though? It is only on 1.5. -Grant
