On Mar 17, 2010, at 9:41 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote: > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Grant Ingersoll <gsing...@apache.org> wrote: >> I tend to agree w/ Hoss here. I don't think we have to be the same version >> numbers and I don't think we absolutely have to do lockstep releases. > > No one said "absolutely". > > It's important to try and release at the same time. Without that, it > makes a lot less sense for Solr to be on Lucene's trunk.
I don't think releasing separately means Solr can't be on Lucene's trunk. The two issues are orthogonal. > Many of us > believe this is important to try to do... so I guess we'll try to do > that, even if everyone isn't on board. I agree, it's important to try, but it isn't a show stopper, which is what the word lockstep implies.
