On Mar 18, 2010, at 2:06 PM, Robert Muir wrote: > On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 1:12 PM, Michael McCandless > <luc...@mikemccandless.com> wrote: >> Ahh, OK. >> >> Meaning Solr will have to remove deprecated support, which means >> Solr's next released version would be a major release? Ie 2.0? >> > > > But we need to work on how to handle some of this: I suppose spatial > is the worst case (don't really know), where Solr has a dependency on > a Lucene contrib specifically labelled as experimental.
FWIW, that dependency is very minimal for this exact reason. Plus, most of spatial in Solr is exposed through function queries, etc.
