: Sorry - I should have quoted it. : You cited user confusion, and I was giving an example of how it was : very easy to explain... an example of what I'd put in the release : notes to explain it.
Ahhh... sorry, yes i did in fact missunderstand that part. : Jumping major releases is a really big, uncompatible deal anyway - it : seems like "user confusion" is a really big stretch. It may be ... but it just seems like such a no brainer easy thing to avoid at such little cost: Use 3.1 and developers in the know will understand that i's because we're using LuceneJava 3.1; but uninformed users *might* be confused as to why it jumped to a (seemingly) arbitrary number. Use 2.0 and even the most uninformed user should "get" that this is a major upgrade; developers will *still* know that we're using LUcene-java 3.1. -Hoss
