They aren't doing the same thing... The first URL is doing a straight facet on the content field. The second URL is doing a facet on the content field and asking for an additional statistic for each bucket.
-Yonik On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > I've tried the following commands and I found that the Legacy Faceting is > actually much faster than JSON Faceting. Not sure why is this so, when the > document from this link http://yonik.com/solr-count-distinct/ states that > JSON Facets has a much lower request latency. > > (For Legacy Facet) - QTime: 22 > > - > http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=paint&facet=true&facet.field=content&rows=0 > <http://27.54.41.220:8983/edm/collection1/select?q=paint&facet=true&facet.field=content&rows=0> > > (For JSON Facet) - QTime: 1128 > > - > http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=paint&json.facet={f:{type:terms,field:content,facet:{stat1:"hll(id)"}}}&rows=0 > <http://27.54.41.220:8983/edm/collection1/select?q=paint&json.facet=%7bf:%7btype:terms,field:content,facet:%7bstat1:%22hll(id)%22%7d%7d%7d&rows=0> > > > Is there any problem with my URL for the JSON Facet? > > > Regards, > > Edwin > > > > On 1 September 2015 at 16:51, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <edwinye...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm using Solr 5.2.1, and I would like to find out, what is the difference >> between Legacy Facets and JSON Facets in Solr? I was told that JSON Facets >> has a much lesser Request Latency, but I couldn't find any major difference >> in speed. Or must we have a larger index in order to have any significant >> difference? >> >> Is there any significant advantage to use JSON Faceting command instead of >> Legacy Faceting command? >> >> Regards, >> Edwin >>
