No, I've tested it several times after committing it. I've tried executing it several times. The QTime for the JSON Facet is always between the range of 400 to 600, while the QTime for the Legacy Facet is usually between 15 to 30.
I have indexed about 1GB of rich-text data into the collection with a large content section, but I don't think this is a problem, since the QTime for Legacy Facet is relatively fast? Both the JSON Facet and Legacy Facet returns the same results. The JSON Facet will only shows the top 10 results by default, while the Legacy Facet will show all (there are about 100 of them for my case). This is what I find strange also, since the JSON Facet is only showing 10 results, so shouldn't it be faster? Regards, Edwin On 2 September 2015 at 11:39, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote: > That's pretty strange... > There can be caching differences. Is this the first time the request > is executed after a commit? > What does executing it again show? > > -Yonik > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi Yonik, > > > > Thanks for pointing out the difference. > > > > I've made modification and tried with this below command for JSON Facet, > > but it is still having a QTime of 410, as compared to the Legacy Facet > > QTime of 22: > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=paint&json.facet={f:{field:content}}&rows=0 > > > > Is this the same as the Legacy Facet query of > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=paint&facet=true&facet.field=content&rows=0 > > < > http://27.54.41.220:8983/edm/collection1/select?q=paint&facet=true&facet.field=content&rows=0 > > > > ? > > > > > > Regards, > > Edwin > > > > > > On 1 September 2015 at 23:24, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> They aren't doing the same thing... > >> > >> The first URL is doing a straight facet on the content field. > >> The second URL is doing a facet on the content field and asking for an > >> additional statistic for each bucket. > >> > >> -Yonik > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 11:08 AM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo > >> <edwinye...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > I've tried the following commands and I found that the Legacy > Faceting is > >> > actually much faster than JSON Faceting. Not sure why is this so, when > >> the > >> > document from this link http://yonik.com/solr-count-distinct/ states > >> that > >> > JSON Facets has a much lower request latency. > >> > > >> > (For Legacy Facet) - QTime: 22 > >> > > >> > - > >> > > >> > http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=paint&facet=true&facet.field=content&rows=0 > >> > < > >> > http://27.54.41.220:8983/edm/collection1/select?q=paint&facet=true&facet.field=content&rows=0 > >> > > >> > > >> > (For JSON Facet) - QTime: 1128 > >> > > >> > - > >> > > >> > http://localhost:8983/solr/collection1/select?q=paint&json.facet={f:{type:terms,field:content,facet:{stat1 > >> :"hll(id)"}}}&rows=0 > >> > < > >> > http://27.54.41.220:8983/edm/collection1/select?q=paint&json.facet=%7bf:%7btype:terms,field:content,facet:%7bstat1:%22hll(id)%22%7d%7d%7d&rows=0 > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > Is there any problem with my URL for the JSON Facet? > >> > > >> > > >> > Regards, > >> > > >> > Edwin > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > On 1 September 2015 at 16:51, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo < > edwinye...@gmail.com> > >> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> Hi, > >> >> > >> >> I'm using Solr 5.2.1, and I would like to find out, what is the > >> difference > >> >> between Legacy Facets and JSON Facets in Solr? I was told that JSON > >> Facets > >> >> has a much lesser Request Latency, but I couldn't find any major > >> difference > >> >> in speed. Or must we have a larger index in order to have any > >> significant > >> >> difference? > >> >> > >> >> Is there any significant advantage to use JSON Faceting command > instead > >> of > >> >> Legacy Faceting command? > >> >> > >> >> Regards, > >> >> Edwin > >> >> > >> >
