I use the snapshooter with rsync 2008/7/29 Rakesh Godhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> After Matthew's comment I was thinking about putting them both behind a > load > balancer, with the LB directing all traffic to one until it fails and then > kick over to the other one. > > In your architectures I'm guessing the masters share the same physical > index, but do the slaves share the same index as the masters or do you use > rsync or some other mechanism to distribute copies. > > Thanks > -Rakesh > > > > > On 7/29/08 5:07 PM, "Alexander Ramos Jardim" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > You could implement a script that woiuld control which master server is > > indexing and put them behind something like a NAT. > > > > I use that that control my master redundancy. > > > > 2008/7/29 Rakesh Godhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > >> Thanks for the input, much appreciated. > >> -Rakesh > >> > >> > >> > >> On 7/29/08 12:18 PM, "Matthew Runo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> As far as I know only one machine can write to an index at a time. > >>> More than that and I got corrupted indexes. > >>> > >>> Thanks! > >>> > >>> Matthew Runo > >>> Software Developer > >>> Zappos.com > >>> 702.943.7833 > >>> > >>> On Jul 28, 2008, at 11:25 AM, Rakesh Godhani wrote: > >>> > >>>> > >>>> Hi, we are currently evaluating Solr and have been browsing the > >>>> archives for > >>>> one particular issue but can¹t seem to find the answer, so please > >>>> forgive me > >>>> if I¹m asking a repetitive question. We like the idea of having > >>>> multiple > >>>> slave servers serving up queries and a master performing updates. > >>>> However > >>>> the the issue for us there is no redundancy for the master. So a > >>>> couple of > >>>> questions: > >>>> > >>>> 1. Can there be multiple masters (or update servers) sharing the > >>>> same index > >>>> files, performing updates at the same time (ie. Hosting the index on > >>>> a SAN)? > >>>> > >>>> 2. Is there a recommended architecture utilizing a SAN. (For > >>>> example 2 > >>>> slaves and 2 masters sharing a SAN). We current don¹t have that many > >>>> records prob about a million and growing. We are mainly concerned > >>>> about > >>>> redundancy, then performance. > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> -Rakesh > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >>> > >> > >> > >> > > > > > -- Alexander Ramos Jardim
