Wait... Is iqdocid set to the <uniqueKey> in your schema? That might be the missing thing.
On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote: > Unless the behavior's changed on the way to version 6.3.0, the get handler > used to use whatever field is set to be the uniqueKey. We have successfully > been using get on a 4.9.0 standalone core with no explicit "id" field > defined by passing in the value for the uniqueKey field to the get handler. > We tend to have a bunch of id fields floating around from different > sources, so we avoid keeping any of them named as "id" > > iqdocid is just a basic string type > <field name="iqdocid" type="string" multiValued="false" indexed="true" > required="true" stored="true"/> > > I'll do some more testing on standalone versions, and see how that goes. > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:52 PM David Hastings <hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> from your previous email: >> "There is no "id" >> field defined in the schema." >> >> you need an id field to use the get handler >> >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote: >> >> > I thought that "id" and "ids" were fixed parameters for the get handler, >> > but I never remember, so I've already tried both. Each time it comes back >> > with the same response of no document. >> > >> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:31 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch < >> arafa...@gmail.com> >> > wrote: >> > >> > > Actually..... >> > > >> > > I think Real Time Get handler has "id" as a magical parameter, not as >> > > a field name. It maps to the real id field via the uniqueKey >> > > definition: >> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/RealTime+Get >> > > >> > > So, if you have not, could you try the way you originally wrote it. >> > > >> > > Regards, >> > > Alex. >> > > ---- >> > > http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and >> > experienced >> > > >> > > >> > > On 15 March 2017 at 13:22, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote: >> > > > Sorry, that is a typo. The get is using the iqdocid field. There is >> no >> > > "id" >> > > > field defined in the schema. >> > > > >> > > > solr/TestCollection/get?iqdocid=2957-TV-201604141900 >> > > > >> > > > solr/TestCollection/select?q=*:*&fq=iqdocid:2957-TV-201604141900 >> > > > >> > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:15 PM Erick Erickson < >> > erickerick...@gmail.com> >> > > > wrote: >> > > > >> > > >> Is this a typo or are you trying to use get with an "id" field and >> > > >> your filter query uses "iqdocid"? >> > > >> >> > > >> Best, >> > > >> Erick >> > > >> >> > > >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> >> > wrote: >> > > >> > Yes, we're using a fixed schema with the iqdocid field set as the >> > > >> uniqueKey. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:28 AM Alexandre Rafalovitch < >> > > >> arafa...@gmail.com> >> > > >> > wrote: >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> What is your uniqueKey? Is it iqdocid? >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> Regards, >> > > >> >> Alex. >> > > >> >> ---- >> > > >> >> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and >> > > >> experienced >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> On 15 March 2017 at 11:24, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> >> wrote: >> > > >> >> > Hi, >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > I've been trying to use the get handler for a new solr cloud >> > > >> collection >> > > >> >> we >> > > >> >> > are using, and something seems to be amiss. >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > We are running 6.3.0, so we did not explicitly define the >> request >> > > >> handler >> > > >> >> > in the solrconfig since it's supposed to be implicitly defined. >> > We >> > > >> also >> > > >> >> > have the update log enabled with the default configuration. >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > Whenever I send a get query for a document already known to be >> in >> > > the >> > > >> >> > collection, I get no documents returned. But when I use a >> filter >> > > >> query on >> > > >> >> > the uniqueKey field for the same value I get the document back >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > solr/TestCollection/get?id=2957-TV-201604141900 >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > >> solr/TestCollection/select?q=*:*&fq=iqdocid:2957-TV-201604141900 >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > Is there some configuration that I am missing? >> > > >> >> > >> > > >> >> > Thanks, >> > > >> >> > Chris >> > > >> >> >> > > >> >> > > >> > >>
