i still would like to see an experiment where you change the field to id instead of iqdocid,
On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote: > Something to do with routing perhaps? (the mapping of ids to shards, > by default is based on hashes of the id) > -Yonik > > > On Thu, Mar 16, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote: > > iqdocid is already set to be the uniqueKey value. > > > > I tried reindexing a few documents back into the problematic cloud and am > > getting the same behavior of no document found for get handler. > > > > I've also done some testing on standalone instances as well as some quick > > cloud setups (with embedded zk), and I cannot seem to replicate the > > problem. For each test, I used the exact same configset that is causing > the > > issue for us and indexed a document from that instance as well. I can > > provide more details if that would be useful in anyway. > > > > Standalone instance worked > > Cloud mode worked regardless of the use of the security plugin > > Cloud mode worked regardless of explicit get handler definition > > Cloud mode consistently worked with explicitly defining the get handler, > > then removing it and reloading the collection > > > > The only differences that I know of between the tests and the problematic > > cloud is that solr is running as a different user and using an external > > zookeeper ensemble. The running user has ownership of the solr > > installation, log, and data directories. > > > > I'm going to keep trying different setups to see if I can replicate the > > issue, but if anyone has any ideas on what direction might make the most > > sense, please let me know. > > > > Thanks again > > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 5:49 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > Wait... Is iqdocid set to the <uniqueKey> in your schema? That might > > be the missing thing. > > > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:20 AM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote: > >> Unless the behavior's changed on the way to version 6.3.0, the get > handler > >> used to use whatever field is set to be the uniqueKey. We have > > successfully > >> been using get on a 4.9.0 standalone core with no explicit "id" field > >> defined by passing in the value for the uniqueKey field to the get > > handler. > >> We tend to have a bunch of id fields floating around from different > >> sources, so we avoid keeping any of them named as "id" > >> > >> iqdocid is just a basic string type > >> <field name="iqdocid" type="string" multiValued="false" indexed="true" > >> required="true" stored="true"/> > >> > >> I'll do some more testing on standalone versions, and see how that goes. > >> > >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:52 PM David Hastings < > > hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> from your previous email: > >>> "There is no "id" > >>> field defined in the schema." > >>> > >>> you need an id field to use the get handler > >>> > >>> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> > wrote: > >>> > >>> > I thought that "id" and "ids" were fixed parameters for the get > > handler, > >>> > but I never remember, so I've already tried both. Each time it comes > > back > >>> > with the same response of no document. > >>> > > >>> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:31 PM Alexandre Rafalovitch < > >>> arafa...@gmail.com> > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > >>> > > Actually..... > >>> > > > >>> > > I think Real Time Get handler has "id" as a magical parameter, not > as > >>> > > a field name. It maps to the real id field via the uniqueKey > >>> > > definition: > >>> > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/RealTime+Get > >>> > > > >>> > > So, if you have not, could you try the way you originally wrote it. > >>> > > > >>> > > Regards, > >>> > > Alex. > >>> > > ---- > >>> > > http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and > >>> > experienced > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > On 15 March 2017 at 13:22, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> wrote: > >>> > > > Sorry, that is a typo. The get is using the iqdocid field. There > is > >>> no > >>> > > "id" > >>> > > > field defined in the schema. > >>> > > > > >>> > > > solr/TestCollection/get?iqdocid=2957-TV-201604141900 > >>> > > > > >>> > > > solr/TestCollection/select?q=*:*&fq=iqdocid:2957-TV-201604141900 > >>> > > > > >>> > > > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 1:15 PM Erick Erickson < > >>> > erickerick...@gmail.com> > >>> > > > wrote: > >>> > > > > >>> > > >> Is this a typo or are you trying to use get with an "id" field > and > >>> > > >> your filter query uses "iqdocid"? > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> Best, > >>> > > >> Erick > >>> > > >> > >>> > > >> On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 8:31 AM, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media > > > >>> > wrote: > >>> > > >> > Yes, we're using a fixed schema with the iqdocid field set as > > the > >>> > > >> uniqueKey. > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> > On Wed, Mar 15, 2017 at 11:28 AM Alexandre Rafalovitch < > >>> > > >> arafa...@gmail.com> > >>> > > >> > wrote: > >>> > > >> > > >>> > > >> >> What is your uniqueKey? Is it iqdocid? > >>> > > >> >> > >>> > > >> >> Regards, > >>> > > >> >> Alex. > >>> > > >> >> ---- > >>> > > >> >> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new > and > >>> > > >> experienced > >>> > > >> >> > >>> > > >> >> > >>> > > >> >> On 15 March 2017 at 11:24, Chris Ulicny <culicny@iq.media> > >>> wrote: > >>> > > >> >> > Hi, > >>> > > >> >> > > >>> > > >> >> > I've been trying to use the get handler for a new solr > cloud > >>> > > >> collection > >>> > > >> >> we > >>> > > >> >> > are using, and something seems to be amiss. > >>> > > >> >> > > >>> > > >> >> > We are running 6.3.0, so we did not explicitly define the > >>> request > >>> > > >> handler > >>> > > >> >> > in the solrconfig since it's supposed to be implicitly > > defined. > >>> > We > >>> > > >> also > >>> > > >> >> > have the update log enabled with the default configuration. > >>> > > >> >> > > >>> > > >> >> > Whenever I send a get query for a document already known to > > be > >>> in > >>> > > the > >>> > > >> >> > collection, I get no documents returned. But when I use a > >>> filter > >>> > > >> query on > >>> > > >> >> > the uniqueKey field for the same value I get the document > > back > >>> > > >> >> > > >>> > > >> >> > solr/TestCollection/get?id=2957-TV-201604141900 > >>> > > >> >> > > >>> > > >> >> > > >>> solr/TestCollection/select?q=*:*&fq=iqdocid:2957-TV-201604141900 > >>> > > >> >> > > >>> > > >> >> > Is there some configuration that I am missing? > >>> > > >> >> > > >>> > > >> >> > Thanks, > >>> > > >> >> > Chris > >>> > > >> >> > >>> > > >> > >>> > > > >>> > > >>> >
