Hi Andrew, Alternatively, you could use a copyfield with a maxChars limit as your highlighting field. Works well in my case.
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-538 Nicolas 2009/11/5 Andrew Clegg <andrew.cl...@gmail.com> > > > Indeed -- it actually went slightly slower but only by a few seconds, I > suspect that's within normal variance. > > I'll hold out for the new version then -- it's certainly not mission > critical. > > Thanks, > > Andrew. > > > markrmiller wrote: > > > > It should be the same speed wither way for a term query. The > > highlighted is going to be slow on general for a 1mb + doc. It > > processes a token at a time. The fast vector highlighter is much > > faster in those cases and should be in the next release. It handles > > fewer query types though. > > > > - Mark > > > > http://www.lucidimagination.com (mobile) > > > > On Nov 4, 2009, at 1:26 PM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org> > > wrote: > > > >> > >> : Has anyone else seen this sort of behaviour before? This is with a > >> nightly > >> : from 2009-10-26. > >> > >> have you tried hl.usePhraseHighlighter=false ? ... > >> > >> > http://old.nabble.com/Highlighting-performance-between-1.3-and-1.4rc-to26190790.html > >> > >> ...it doesn't seem like it should be affecting you for a simple term > >> query, but i'm not sure. > >> > >> > >> > >> -Hoss > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://old.nabble.com/Highlighting-is-very-slow-tp26160216p26211697.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
