Actually, that's true. But IMO it's not that great :) After fighting it for a bit, we gave up on it ... (maybe more of a reflection of our capabilities rather than Solr's - but Id like to think we are some-way competant)
-N -----Original Message----- From: Adamsky, Robert [mailto:radam...@techtarget.com] Sent: 21 January 2010 18:16 To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org Subject: RE: Solr vs. Compass > 2) Compass does a number of things really nicely (that afaik, isn't > addressed by Solr) > + Object-search engine mapping (great for structured data - i.e. not just text documents). I find writing the code that converts to/from a SolrDocument a bit annoying (but in my current project, the data is really simple). If you have many different kinds of things that you want to index ... Compass has an advantage. Solrj does have ability to write pojos and annotate them for mapping to/from solr. =============================================================================== Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html ===============================================================================
