On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 10:37:51PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2009 at 01:10:04PM +0200, Manuel Bouyer wrote: > > > Your change works around a bug with sparc64 > > > > it's sparc, not sparc64. > > > > > or perhaps even gcc. Please > > > address the root cause instead. Thanks. > > > > I'll try to look at ports which have inline spl*() function and add missing > > insn_barrier(). But it may not be before next week > > I've been though the MD code. I filled in a PR for port-hp700, > port-powerpc and port-sparc. All m68k and the vax port also have the > issue (confirmed by mhitch@, thanks !) > Other ports looks safe (they either use __insn_barrier() or assembly > equivalent, or use real function calls).
I seem to recall arm (maybe evbarm) code being semi-inconsistent in this respect (the spl* calls are per-board at least in many of the evbarm variants), but I haven't actually gone and looked... did those check out OK as well? (Yes, I'm being lazy, but I thought I'd note it just in case). --rafal -- Time is an illusion; lunchtime, doubly so. |/\/\| Rafal Boni -- Ford Prefect |\/\/| ra...@pobox.com