On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:53:02PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> i'm not happy about this change.  i wish that bsdtar was
> fixed to not be unfriendly, because it mostly is a better
> implementation.  just these edge cases are rather ..
> problematic yet these issues are being ignored or
> rejected as being irrelevant.

Me neither, especially as we now effectively have different command line
args passed from sysinst to tar depending on the tar invocation (and this
is all hard coded). I'll have to make it a define in sysinst depending
on the seleted tar variant :-/.


Reply via email to