On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:53:02PM +1100, matthew green wrote: > i'm not happy about this change. i wish that bsdtar was > fixed to not be unfriendly, because it mostly is a better > implementation. just these edge cases are rather .. > problematic yet these issues are being ignored or > rejected as being irrelevant.
Me neither, especially as we now effectively have different command line args passed from sysinst to tar depending on the tar invocation (and this is all hard coded). I'll have to make it a define in sysinst depending on the seleted tar variant :-/. Martin