On 14/11/2019 05:47, Martin Husemann wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 03:53:02PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
i'm not happy about this change. i wish that bsdtar was
fixed to not be unfriendly, because it mostly is a better
implementation. just these edge cases are rather ..
problematic yet these issues are being ignored or
rejected as being irrelevant.
Me neither, especially as we now effectively have different command line
args passed from sysinst to tar depending on the tar invocation (and this
is all hard coded). I'll have to make it a define in sysinst depending
on the seleted tar variant :-/.
Just for the record, I don't really care about different cmd line args,
symlinks and security involved.
My expectation is that a modern NetBSD tar can extract a modern tar
archive from other sources.
If it cannot do this we have failed.