Naveen Reddy wrote: > Hi Christian, > > Yes. They were both built together. I will resubmit and try to build > it again.
Just resubmit the spec in the same thread. _Christian > > Thanks, > Naveen > > Christian Kelly wrote: >> Naveen Reddy wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I am tryting to port libxcb to source juicer. Package 'libxcb' >>> depends on 'xcb-proto', for which I have submitted another SPEC file >>> and has successfully built. >>> >>> Now 'libxcb' fails with the following error: >>> >>> *--- date stamp --- Mon Apr 20 11:33:23 BST 2009 >>> >>> INFO: Checking dependencies of libxcb >>> WARNING: skipping package libxcb: required package xcb-proto not >>> installed >>> WARNING: and no spec file specified on the command line provides it >>> INFO: Hint: use the --autodeps to locate spec files for dependencies >>> automatically >>> WARNING: libxcb won't be built as it requires xcb-proto >>> * >>> >>> Now with '--autodeps' option, will it look for unreviewed >>> packages(that have successfully built) also or should I wait till >>> 'xcb-proto' goes to '/contrib' to build 'libxcb'? >> >> It should automatically install any dependencies that are needed from >> /pending. So, what you're describing *should* work. Were they >> submitted close together? Have you tried re-submitting libxcb? >> >> _Christian >> >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Naveen >>> >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >> >
