Christian Kelly wrote: > Naveen Reddy wrote: >> Hi Christian, >> >> Yes. They were both built together. I will resubmit and try to build >> it again. > > Just resubmit the spec in the same thread. > > _Christian >
Done that. Will the spec be validated again? - Naveen >> >> Thanks, >> Naveen >> >> Christian Kelly wrote: >>> Naveen Reddy wrote: >>>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> I am tryting to port libxcb to source juicer. Package 'libxcb' >>>> depends on 'xcb-proto', for which I have submitted another SPEC >>>> file and has successfully built. >>>> >>>> Now 'libxcb' fails with the following error: >>>> >>>> *--- date stamp --- Mon Apr 20 11:33:23 BST 2009 >>>> >>>> INFO: Checking dependencies of libxcb >>>> WARNING: skipping package libxcb: required package xcb-proto not >>>> installed >>>> WARNING: and no spec file specified on the command line provides it >>>> INFO: Hint: use the --autodeps to locate spec files for >>>> dependencies automatically >>>> WARNING: libxcb won't be built as it requires xcb-proto >>>> * >>>> >>>> Now with '--autodeps' option, will it look for unreviewed >>>> packages(that have successfully built) also or should I wait till >>>> 'xcb-proto' goes to '/contrib' to build 'libxcb'? >>> >>> It should automatically install any dependencies that are needed >>> from /pending. So, what you're describing *should* work. Were they >>> submitted close together? Have you tried re-submitting libxcb? >>> >>> _Christian >>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Naveen >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>> >> >
