Naveen Reddy wrote: > Christian Kelly wrote: >> Naveen Reddy wrote: >>> Hi Christian, >>> >>> Yes. They were both built together. I will resubmit and try to >>> build it again. >> >> Just resubmit the spec in the same thread. >> >> _Christian >> > > Done that. Will the spec be validated again? >
Won't need to be. Should just build automatically. _Christian > - Naveen > >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Naveen >>> >>> Christian Kelly wrote: >>>> Naveen Reddy wrote: >>>>> Hi All, >>>>> >>>>> I am tryting to port libxcb to source juicer. Package 'libxcb' >>>>> depends on 'xcb-proto', for which I have submitted another SPEC >>>>> file and has successfully built. >>>>> >>>>> Now 'libxcb' fails with the following error: >>>>> >>>>> *--- date stamp --- Mon Apr 20 11:33:23 BST 2009 >>>>> >>>>> INFO: Checking dependencies of libxcb >>>>> WARNING: skipping package libxcb: required package xcb-proto not >>>>> installed >>>>> WARNING: and no spec file specified on the command line provides it >>>>> INFO: Hint: use the --autodeps to locate spec files for >>>>> dependencies automatically >>>>> WARNING: libxcb won't be built as it requires xcb-proto >>>>> * >>>>> >>>>> Now with '--autodeps' option, will it look for unreviewed >>>>> packages(that have successfully built) also or should I wait till >>>>> 'xcb-proto' goes to '/contrib' to build 'libxcb'? >>>> >>>> It should automatically install any dependencies that are needed >>>> from /pending. So, what you're describing *should* work. Were they >>>> submitted close together? Have you tried re-submitting libxcb? >>>> >>>> _Christian >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Naveen >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss mailing list >>>>> sourcejuicer-discuss at opensolaris.org >>>>> http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/sourcejuicer-discuss >>>> >>> >> >
