Jan Stary <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Sep 20 22:24:28, [email protected] wrote:
> > Thanks, it's sitting in my "pu" branch on git://80x24.org/sox
> > with Alex credited as the author.
>
> Thank you.
>
> What is the relation of this git branch at git://80x24.org/sox
> to the actual SoX repository at git://git.code.sf.net/p/sox/code ?
Just another git repository. I don't have rights on SF,
nor do I much care for the URL[*]
And I believe git URLs should be treated equally (so I reject
the Embrace, Extend, ... concept of git hosts which add
proprietary features to git).
I'm just keeping my git repo on git://80x24.org/sox up-to-date
so Chris et al. can more easily resume maintenance someday
without having to dig through bug tracker + archives.
[*] Except sf.net makes the usability mistake of having
"code" as the basename, making the user type more when
cloning (or end up with a directory named "code").
Back in the day, gitorious.org made a similar mistake,
which I think hurt their adoption.
> > commit ea4f3fb3c6de93e10786fbfc1cb1bdf9006bbcdb
> > Author: Alexandre Ratchov <[email protected]>
> > Date: Tue Sep 20 22:00:40 2016 +0000
> >
> > sndio: handle 24-bit samples properly on OpenBSD
>
> That's a bit misleading: it will properly handle
> whatever bitwidth SoX asks for. The 24 vs 32 was
> just the initiating problem.
Oops. Can you propose a standalone commit message which
I can copy and use directly? Thanks.
(I much prefer commit messages written with the patch
submission itself, basically, same conventions as
Linux kernel and git.git development).
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
SoX-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel
