On Aug 27 21:18:21, h...@stare.cz wrote: > On Aug 27 19:50:52, m...@mansr.com wrote: > > Jan Stary <h...@stare.cz> writes: > > > > > However, having a patch in a build system that is not even expected > > > to apply cleanly is extremely fragile (beside being ugly). > > > It depends on the precise GNU libtool version; > > > > I'm perfectly happy to ignore it and let OpenBSD users deal with it > > however they please.
The easiest way to deal with it I am aware of is "make LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool". Doing that is surely better than trying to patch the broken GNU libtool, as configure.ac currently does. > A simple and obvious solution is to set > LIBTOOL=/usr/bin/libtool on OpenBSD, which > > 1. does not have the very bug that's causing the problem > 2. is native to the platform > > Don't you find it cleaner and more maintainable > than the current "patch" to the broken GNU libtool? > > No, really: don't you? _______________________________________________ SoX-devel mailing list SoX-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/sox-devel
