ŚLIPEK Krzysztof wrote: % Hi Jan, % This server was always patched by applying errata through Spacewalk server. % Is it a possibility to repair it with rpm command? Should I submit case to Red Hat support in your opinion?
I think your rpm database isn't corrupted you just have installed openssl.x86_64 twice. Not sure why... It should be fixed by # yum shell > remove openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4.x86_64 > update openssl-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1.i686 > transaction run % Thanks for reply and best regards, % Chris % % ------------------------------ % % > rpm -qa|grep openssl % > % > openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4 % > openssl-devel-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1 % > openssl-devel-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1 % > openssl-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1 % > openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4 % > -- % > On client are installed: % > % > Package Name Architecture Installed % > openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4 i686 10/24/12 4:23:25 PM CEST % > openssl-0.9.8e-22.el5_8.4 x86_64 10/24/12 4:23:23 PM CEST % > openssl-0.9.8e-26.el5_9.1 x86_64 5/8/13 12:34:24 PM CEST % % This is weird. It looks like your rpm database is corrupted / confused if it thinks it has the same package (in same arch) in two different versions. -- Michael Mráka Satellite Engineering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
