Daryl, good afternoon Have you checked your log files looking for some error ?! When you create your environment, you create a repo, after a base channel, after ?!
Have you registered the servers directly to your base channel or before did a cloned channel and them register the server to the clonned new channel ?! Case you did the cloned (and I really recommend), you can check your logs, imagine, during the cloning process, one error happened, the metadata or files in fact can be corrupted, showing a wrong information or strange things happening, like showing to be necessary update, although you don't have packages to update. Let me know if was clear. ______________ Atenciosamente Waldirio msn: waldi...@gmail.com Skype: waldirio Site: www.waldirio.com.br Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646 PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 1:31 PM, Daryl Rose <rosed...@gmail.com> wrote: > I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I created a > 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client server > and registered it on to the Spacewalk server. > > When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many how > many updated packages it needed by doing a "yum update". It needed 264 > packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I then > registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to see if > it was up to date or not. Spacewalk is telling me that the client is > up-to-date. This is not accurate, why? > > Thanks. > > Daryl > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list