Daryl I sent a email to list last month about it ( https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2014-October/msg00222.html), take a look, the idea is the same.
Tell me if is ok to you, about understanding, case not, I can create a post about it in my blog. B'Regards ______________ Atenciosamente Waldirio msn: waldi...@gmail.com Skype: waldirio Site: www.waldirio.com.br Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646 PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Daryl Rose <rosed...@gmail.com> wrote: > Amedeo, > > For the 6.5 base I used the URL path: > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/os/x86_64/ > > I am in the process of adding an update channel, and I am using URL: > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos-6/6.5/updates/x86_64/ > > Are these not correct? Should I use only > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6? > > The documentation leaves a lot to be desired and doesn't provide an > example of setting up the repository channel. I found a YouTube video of a > guy setting up a Spacewalk channel and repository. He used the first URL > that I posted. Is using http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6 a better > method? > > Any and all suggestions made are greatly appreciated. > > Thank you. > > Daryl > > > > On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:59 AM, Amedeo Salvati <ame...@oscert.net> wrote: > >> >> @daryl >> did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like: >> >> /mirrors/CentOS/6.5 >> >> or you use generic 6 version? like: >> >> /mirrors/CentOS/6 >> >> both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new minor >> release will empty updates directory on the last one >> >> best regards >> a >> >> Da: spacewalk-list-boun...@redhat.com >> A: spacewalk-list@redhat.com >> Cc: >> Data: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:44:25 +0100 >> Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date? >> >> > Daryl Rose wrote: >> > % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I created >> a >> > % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client >> server >> > % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server. >> > % >> > % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many >> how many >> > % updated packages it needed by doing a "yum update". It needed 264 >> > % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I then >> > % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to >> see if >> > % it was up to date or not. Spacewalk is telling me that the client is >> > % up-to-date. This is not accurate, why? >> > >> > So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in >> Spacewalk. >> > And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't >> accurate? >> > >> > If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know >> about updates. >> > >> > % Thanks. >> > % >> > % Daryl >> > >> > Regards, >> > >> > -- >> > Michael Mráka >> > Satellite Engineering, Red Hat >> > >> > _______________________________________________ >> > Spacewalk-list mailing list >> > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Spacewalk-list mailing list >> Spacewalk-list@redhat.com >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > Spacewalk-list@redhat.com > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list >
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list Spacewalk-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list