Michael, I'm not sure that I understand your response. The client is CentOS 6.5, not 6.6. Yes, the Spacewalk server is 6.6, but the client is 6.5. I purposefully chose 6.5 because its an older release and I know there are a number of packages that would be out of date.
Thank you Daryl On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Michael Mraka <[email protected]> wrote: > Daryl Rose wrote: > % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I created a > % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client server > % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server. > % > % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many how > many > % updated packages it needed by doing a "yum update". It needed 264 > % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I then > % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to see if > % it was up to date or not. Spacewalk is telling me that the client is > % up-to-date. This is not accurate, why? > > So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in > Spacewalk. > And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't accurate? > > If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know about > updates. > > % Thanks. > % > % Daryl > > Regards, > > -- > Michael Mráka > Satellite Engineering, Red Hat > > _______________________________________________ > Spacewalk-list mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
_______________________________________________ Spacewalk-list mailing list [email protected] https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
